Should they choose to enforce the ruling (they might simply have wanted to prevent EMI from stepping outside of their agreement, thereby establishing precedent, or they might be using the ruling as a bargaining position come renegotiation time), I can’t see how this doesn’t amount to Pink Floyd cutting off their noses to spite their faces.

A few things come to mind:

1. While it’s true that the Gilmour/Mason/Wright version of Pink Floyd did perform Dark Side as a set during the latter half of Division Bell tour in 1995, as did Roger Waters on his 2007 tour, they’ve both regularly played songs from many of their ‘concept albums’ individually, too. This implies that the suit was ether about money or control, or both.
2. If it’s about money, I wish them luck. Die-hard fans will, of course, buy the full albums either way, if they haven’t already bought multiple copies over the years (my Dark Side of the Moon collection is ridiculous), but casual fans will want to buy Money, Comfortably Numb and Wish You Were Here. Which group do you suppose represents the larger market?
3. This sounds like an attempt to control how people listen to their music. A) Why bother? B) Get over yourselves. I like Pink Floyd and Roger Waters’ music more than most, but I certainly don’t listen to it the way it was released. Who has that kind of time? (It must be said, though, that Wish You Were Here is the greatest rock album ever made, regardless of what fans of Exile on Main Street might say)

But why is this futile? Because people don’t want it.

Adam Engst, of TidBITS (@tidbits), wrote a thoughtful opinion piece called The Rise and Fall of Bundle-based Business in which he states:

All this unbundling happened due to customer demand and because new technology, largely the Internet, made it possible. After all, who hasn’t felt slightly cheated after buying an album and discovering that some of its songs are far less appealing than others, or realizing that none of the articles in a magazine were compelling enough to read? This shouldn’t be surprising: enabling each member of a family to order a completely different meal in a restaurant has long been seen as “better” than a home-cooked meal where everyone is forced to share the same dishes, whether or not they are equally well liked. Unbundling promotes choice, and, within reason, people like choice.

Are David Gilmour and Nick Mason (Pink Floyd’s surviving members) within their rights to demand that their contract with EMI be upheld? Absolutely. Do they (together with former member Roger Waters) have the right to exert control over how their creative work is disseminated? Of course they do.

And will their fans, both die-hard and casual, continue to ignore all this when it suits them? To quote everyone’s favourite quitter, “you betcha!”

(Via BBC NEWS.)

A Pig’s Tale: Roger Waters Traces the History of Rock’s Most Famous Prop : Rolling Stone: “A Pig’s Tale: Roger Waters Traces the History of Rock’s Most Famous Prop”

No, I won’t use this as another lame excuse to flaunt my own Roger Waters pig photo

Seems Roger’s pig got the urge to fly off, but it’s been returned. Not quite intact, however.

BBC has a brief video.

At last: a chance to re-use my photo of Roger’s inflatable pig from Calgary in June…

Get out of the road if you want to grow old.

This brings his total song output since 1992′s Amused to Death to seven — eight, if you count the live version of Each Small Candle.

That’s not counting live recordings of earlier works or his opera, ?ɂİa Ira.

Hey, Roger, you really ought to put an album out.

Update: Pink Floyd’s renditions of Breathe and Money were great. According to Rolling Stone, they also played Wish You Were Here. Thank God CTV covered all of Motley Crue and left out what Ben Mulroney Himself described as “the most anticipated moment of Live 8″…

I’m assuming there’s a Pink Floyd fan among the crew in London, as there was an extreme zoom-in on Battersea that was pulled-back to reveal the band playing in Hyde Park. A nice touch.

If you’re a Mac user, you might also like to let music.aol.com know that their choice of streaming Windows Media means that you’re one of tens of millions who can’t watch. Thanks, guys. (In case you’re wondering, yes, Windows Media Player for Mac does exist, but it doesn’t support in-line video, streamed video, DRM’d video, Microsoft’s latest video compression/decompression algorithms, or — as far as I can tell — video.)