Archive for May, 2010

A collection of recent articles about Facebook and privacy

It might be handy to keep my bookmarked articles about Facebook’s recent troubles regarding the backlash against their heavy-handed and arrogant approach to their members’ privacy. These are roughly in chronological order, starting on May 7th:

Put me down as unimpressed.

It has been suggested that Facebook will be regulated, and that might make everything okay. The oil industry is regulated; how’s that working out?

I don’t actually expect Facebook to make any serious, long-term improvements to privacy. It’s in their members’ interest for them to do so, but it opposes their own financial interests. Guess which will win? I don’t expect many people will abandon their accounts over this, either. It has long been shown that people don’t value their privacy, and Facebook knows this.

Comments

Why I’ve (re)joined the 6,400,000,000 people who aren’t on Facebook

I’ve had it with Facebook.

Seriously. I’m out.

Wired has an article on Facebook privacy that articulates a number of my reasons.

Fundamentally, I think people are missing the big picture with regard to online services such as those offered by companies like Google or Facebook. Yes, they offer services, and those services have value.

And while they might be free, they also have a cost. Whether or not they’re worth the cost is a decision you have to make for yourself.

Facebook, like Google, makes its money selling advertising, and the more they know about the users of their services, the more they can charge for their ads.

The members are the product. (Marshall McLuhan would love it.)

This isn’t my idea (I’ve forgotten where I came across it now), but it’s a powerful one. It explains fully why (Facebook founder) Zuckerberg has zero interest in protecting anyone’s privacy.

His best interests are directly at odds with his site’s members’.

For me, Facebook became more nuisance than it was worth when I started wasting more and more of my time trying to locate settings that would allow me to opt-out of whatever it was that they’d just decided everyone on the planet needed to know about me that they have previously allowed me to share only with Friends.

Enough.

That’s why I’m out.

People talk dismissively about Twitter, about how insignificant it is since it only has an estimated 100 million users* compared to Facebook’s 400 million.

How many hundred million “friends” does any one person need?

The last straw was how Facebook taunted me by telling me that my friends were going to miss me, and how none of them would be able to contact me any more. Unbelievable arrogance.

Count me in with the 6.4 billion people who aren’t on Facebook.

11 pm Update: The New York Times interview with Elliot Schrage, vice president for public policy at Facebook, underscores my reasons: Facebook is opt-in, he claims, because if you’re a member, you’ve opted-in for whatever the hell they decide. No, thanks.

11:07 pm update: NY Times’ Facebook privacy infographic: “A Bewildering Tangle of Options”. Via DaringFireball.net. [Also added "Privacy" tag.]

Comments