<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Response to Daring Fireball&#8217;s Take on Wired&#8217;s Article on 37signals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.tantramar.com/2008/02/26/a-response-to-daring-fireballs-take-on-wireds-article-on-37signals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.tantramar.com/2008/02/26/a-response-to-daring-fireballs-take-on-wireds-article-on-37signals/</link>
	<description>Just another blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:21:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://chris.tantramar.com/2008/02/26/a-response-to-daring-fireballs-take-on-wireds-article-on-37signals/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.tantramar.com/2008/02/26/a-response-to-daring-fireballs-take-on-wireds-article-on-37signals/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>David and Jason,

Thanks for your comment and follow-up.

David, it was wrong of me to put words in your mouth, even in a hypothetical way, and I apologize for that.

I won&#039;t go into the specifics of changes/enhancements we&#039;d suggested for Basecamp; that ship has sailed. Features that were crucial to our use of Basecamp were not important enough to implement. A negative response &lt;em&gt;feels very much like&lt;/em&gt; a &#039;fuck you&#039;, especially when the suggestion wasn&#039;t made lightly and others thought it worthwhile.

I do admire what you&#039;ve done with Basecamp, Rails, etc., and I&#039;ve recommended Basecamp to others who continue to rely on it. But we&#039;ve moved on.

Continued success — and congrats on the coverage in &lt;em&gt;Wired&lt;/em&gt;. Good &#039;Warhol inches&#039; to have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David and Jason,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment and follow-up.</p>
<p>David, it was wrong of me to put words in your mouth, even in a hypothetical way, and I apologize for that.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t go into the specifics of changes/enhancements we&#8217;d suggested for Basecamp; that ship has sailed. Features that were crucial to our use of Basecamp were not important enough to implement. A negative response <em>feels very much like</em> a &#8216;fuck you&#8217;, especially when the suggestion wasn&#8217;t made lightly and others thought it worthwhile.</p>
<p>I do admire what you&#8217;ve done with Basecamp, Rails, etc., and I&#8217;ve recommended Basecamp to others who continue to rely on it. But we&#8217;ve moved on.</p>
<p>Continued success — and congrats on the coverage in <em>Wired</em>. Good &#8216;Warhol inches&#8217; to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Fried</title>
		<link>http://chris.tantramar.com/2008/02/26/a-response-to-daring-fireballs-take-on-wireds-article-on-37signals/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Fried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.tantramar.com/2008/02/26/a-response-to-daring-fireballs-take-on-wireds-article-on-37signals/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Shoot, sorry. Gotta pull the /admin/ out of there:
http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/881-37signals-featured-in-wired-march-2008-issue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shoot, sorry. Gotta pull the /admin/ out of there:<br />
<a href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/881-37signals-featured-in-wired-march-2008-issue" rel="nofollow">http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/881-37signals-featured-in-wired-march-2008-issue</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Fried</title>
		<link>http://chris.tantramar.com/2008/02/26/a-response-to-daring-fireballs-take-on-wireds-article-on-37signals/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Fried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.tantramar.com/2008/02/26/a-response-to-daring-fireballs-take-on-wireds-article-on-37signals/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re curious, we&#039;ve just posted our response to the piece:
http://www.37signals.com/svn/admin/posts/881-37signals-featured-in-wired-march-2008-issue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re curious, we&#8217;ve just posted our response to the piece:<br />
<a href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/admin/posts/881-37signals-featured-in-wired-march-2008-issue" rel="nofollow">http://www.37signals.com/svn/admin/posts/881-37signals-featured-in-wired-march-2008-issue</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHH</title>
		<link>http://chris.tantramar.com/2008/02/26/a-response-to-daring-fireballs-take-on-wireds-article-on-37signals/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>DHH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.tantramar.com/2008/02/26/a-response-to-daring-fireballs-take-on-wireds-article-on-37signals/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Christopher, we don&#039;t say fuck you to customers requesting features. That&#039;s insane. Why would we do that? The article did indeed offer a much &quot;ginned-up&quot; version of reality.

Now we may very well still say no to custom requests. We do that frequently. Including our own feature requests. That&#039;s how we got to that &quot;admirable overall level of intuitiveness&quot;. It&#039;s a very easy thing to lose. There&#039;s nothing easier than just saying yes, yes, yes all the time.

So I&#039;m sad to see you go as a customer and you definitely do the right thing by picking a product that has the features you feel that you need, but please don&#039;t blow that into an image that we say fuck you to people who request features. That&#039;s simply not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher, we don&#8217;t say fuck you to customers requesting features. That&#8217;s insane. Why would we do that? The article did indeed offer a much &#8220;ginned-up&#8221; version of reality.</p>
<p>Now we may very well still say no to custom requests. We do that frequently. Including our own feature requests. That&#8217;s how we got to that &#8220;admirable overall level of intuitiveness&#8221;. It&#8217;s a very easy thing to lose. There&#8217;s nothing easier than just saying yes, yes, yes all the time.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m sad to see you go as a customer and you definitely do the right thing by picking a product that has the features you feel that you need, but please don&#8217;t blow that into an image that we say fuck you to people who request features. That&#8217;s simply not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
